What Does $104 Million Buy These Days?


We’re not in a recession anymore. Well, at least not everyone.

 

Just a few days ago, someone bought a life-sized bronze sculpture of a man by Alberto Giacometti for the world record price of $65,001,250 pounds or about $104.3 million.

 

That’s insane.

 

It took only eight minutes for bidders to reach the hammer price after the auction opened at $12 million pounds. This was the most expensive work ever to be sold at auction.

 

The buyer remains anonymous—having bought the piece through phone bidding.

So what does $104 million dollars buy you? Well, for the winning bidder, a piece of rare 20th Century Swiss art.


But why is this piece so expensive? It seems that, according to one insider, there’s a unique market for such “exceptional things.” More specifically, this piece was a “once in a lifetime opportunity” to many people and hence its astronomical price.

 

Perhaps I am just simply not an art aficionado. I would never pay that much money for a single sculpture, regardless of its artist, topic, history or worth. Actually, I would never pay that much money for a single thing—ever. I can think of at least five other things to do with $100 million than to spend it on a sculpture that will just collect dust and look pretty in a museum or in my living room.

 

As John Stossel likes to say, “Give me a break!”

 

In case you were wondering, the previous world record breaking price for an art work was $58,520,830 pounds commanded by Pablo Picasso’s “Garcon a la Pipe” which sold in New York in 2004.

 

These world record prices don’t include any private sales that command higher prices.For example, in 2006, Jackson Pollock’s No5, 1948 sold for $140 million!

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
Page: 1 of 1
  • 2/5/2010 10:26 AM Justin McGonigle wrote:
    What upsets me the most is that because this work is now in private collection and not in a museum it won't be on view to the general public. I'm still waiting for my chance to see Giorgio De Chirico's Mystery and Melancholy of a Street, which is also in private collection. I did get to see Jasper John's False Start a few years ago at a retrospective of his at the Met (which was great!)
    Reply to this
    1. 2/5/2010 10:41 AM Socialista wrote:
      That's true. I'm wondering if it was some sort of foundation though that bought it. If not, I would imagine at some point the owner will lend it to a museum for an exhibit. One would hope, at least.

      Reply to this
      1. 2/5/2010 10:46 AM Justin McGonigle wrote:
        One would hope.
        Reply to this

Page: 1 of 1
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.